| Author | Message |
|---|
| Matt | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 282 |
|
| I'm up for that! Except, I'm already a member of both clubs :o( |
Posted:
Mon 13th Feb, 2006
11:12am |
| Frodo | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 743 |
|
 | patience. what will be will be. 100 is 100 is 100, and soon enough there will be that many members using proper numbers. theres plenty of other excuses for drunkeness, if thats your thing, so all this talk of redefining number systems and using different base numbers is rubbish. |
Posted:
Mon 13th Feb, 2006
6:36pm |
| Where Am I | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 757 |
|
| base 91 would mean we were WAAAY of target; the club only containing only 10 members!!!
we could however use base 9 but then we would have long ago achieved our goal as
91 > 100(in base9) = 9^2 = 81
so changing base helps none!
(the mathematician in me could not allow such innacuracies to be left to frollock)
|
Posted:
Mon 13th Feb, 2006
7:06pm |
| Matt | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 282 |
|
| In base 91, we would have reached the next order of magnitude, which is what de wanted diddle we?
But I agree, changing base achieves little other than making us both look rather sad. It has meant that we're on our way to EIGHT pages of talking bollocks now! |
Posted:
Tue 14th Feb, 2006
9:13am |
| Nicky | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 404 |
|
 | yay!!!
although i am mightly confused by now! |
Posted:
Tue 14th Feb, 2006
11:48am |
| Paul | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 112 |
|
| Probably higher quality bollocks than what we will be producing after said centurion!! |
Posted:
Tue 14th Feb, 2006
11:52am |
| tv tom | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 1139 |
|
 | all this number stuff is bollocks let us look into the history of members and find out who hasnt joined up, very easy, little confusion and should definately work! |
Posted:
Thu 16th Feb, 2006
8:33pm |
| Frank | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 791 |
|
| we don't keep a history of members.. |
Posted:
Thu 16th Feb, 2006
11:57pm |
| Frank | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 791 |
|
| 93 members now
(and more impressively, 67 comments on this post, surely a record in itself? how about just having a 100 comments party?) |
Posted:
Sun 5th Mar, 2006
5:12pm |
| Fash | Post subject: Re: Centenary Party! (Will YOU be the 100th member?) | |
| Posts: 117 |
|
 | I think TV's just chatting about history, as that's the doss subject he happens to study. Its certainly not for any real particular interest in the dates and times of members joining the club. If i'm honest I think that's a bit sad.
How about we perform a members audit to ensure that the count of 93 is in fact accurate??? Hmmm.... |
Posted:
Sun 7th May, 2006
12:34am |
|
and
